H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Tomas Smid H2H: 4-0
Miloslav Mecir holds a 4–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1988 US Open first round 7-5 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1988* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 7-5 6-4 6-0 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1988* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 6-2 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1987* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 6-3 6-3 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1987* | Milan | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Miloslav Mecir | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |