H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Miloslav Mecir vs Yannick Noah H2H: 2-1
Miloslav Mecir holds a 2–1 lead over Yannick Noah in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Yannick Noah leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miloslav Mecir won the 1989 Indian Wells final 3-6 2-6 6-1 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | F | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 3-6 2-6 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1987* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 7-5 5-1 (ret.) | Yannick Noah | Match data |
| May 20, 1985* | Rome | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Yannick Noah | 6-3 3-6 6-2 7-6 | Miloslav Mecir | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
| Yannick Noah | #1,303 | #3 | 1,079 | 2,196 | 456 | 194 | 70.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miloslav Mecir | Yannick Noah | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #49 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #26 | 1,931 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #18 | 1,887 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #13 | 1,915 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 36–9 | 80.0% | #5 | 2,085 | 1 | 14 |
| 24 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #9 | 1,996 | 1 | 14 |
| 25 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #7 | 1,954 | 1 | 17 |
| 26 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #4 | 1,994 | 1 | 19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #8 | 1,921 | 1 | 21 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 32–10 | 76.2% | #12 | 1,940 | 1 | 22 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,875 | 1 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #40 | 1,724 | 1 | 23 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #188 | 1,716 | 1 | 23 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #552 | 1,692 | 1 | 23 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,678 | 1 | 23 |