H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Alejandro Tabilo H2H: 1-1
Miomir Kecmanovic and Alejandro Tabilo are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alejandro Tabilo leads 1–0 on clay, while Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2022 Wimbledon second round 7-6(4) 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Chile
Age 29
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(4) 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | Alejandro Tabilo | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2022* | Santiago | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Alejandro Tabilo | 6-1 6-4 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alejandro Tabilo | #31 | #19 | 2,043 | 1,880 | 84 | 78 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Alejandro Tabilo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #169 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |