H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 2–1 lead over Miomir Kecmanovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2022 Canadian Open first round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-1 7-5 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | Aug 10, 2022* | R64 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data | Apr 30, 2022* | SF | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Mar 15, 2022* | R32 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #64 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,942 | 175 | 191 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 42.4% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 19 | 18 | 37 | 51.4% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 113 | 120 | 233 | 48.5% | 43 | 48 | 91 | 47.3% | 19 | 23 | 42 | 45.2% | — | 76 | 76 | 152 | 50.0% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2018 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 54.9% | 68.6% | 48.8% | 61.8% | 66.7% | 59.6% | 30.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 42/42 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 61.7% | 72.2% | 55.9% | 59.9% | 36.4% | 65.9% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 29/29 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 56.8% | 71.1% | 52.0% | 61.8% | 45.0% | 62.8% | 38.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 37/39 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 61.3% | 66.1% | 52.4% | 53.5% | 38.6% | 60.6% | 36.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 61/61 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 62.8% | 69.6% | 54.7% | 58.7% | 42.9% | 64.2% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 54/54 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 60.8% | 69.7% | 54.3% | 60.4% | 41.5% | 63.7% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 53/53 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 61.8% | 70.6% | 53.0% | 54.7% | 38.0% | 64.0% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 46/50 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 61.7% | 73.4% | 49.8% | 56.0% | 42.4% | 64.3% | 36.6% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2026 | 36/36 | 4.9 | 2.6 | 62.1% | 72.7% | 53.9% | 54.4% | 37.9% | 65.4% | 35.5% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 39/40 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 73.3% | 45.7% | 64.1% | 46.5% | 62.9% | 38.8% |
| Career | — | 360/366 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 61.3% | 70.6% | 53.3% | 57.4% | 40.5% | 63.9% | 36.8% | — | 241/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% | 62.3% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2017 | 1523 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1523 | 109.1 | -2.34 | -0.04 | 0.761 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | -0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1738 | 136.0 | +1.11 | +0.25 | 1.049 | 50.7% | -45 | -109 | -70 | 49.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 10–15 (40%) | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 1811 | 152.0 | +0.41 | +0.92 | 1.024 | 50.6% | -34 | -102 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 7–1 (88%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -1.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1681 | 139.9 | -2.18 | -0.06 | 0.934 | 48.6% | -2 | +40 | -20 | 43.4% | -0.55 | 4–12 (25%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | -0.07 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 1880 | 158.3 | +1.28 | +2.51 | 1.087 | 51.3% | +3 | -38 | -181 | 57.9% | +0.44 | 9–7 (56%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.44 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1682 | 143.3 | -0.28 | +0.50 | 1.022 | 50.3% | +34 | +72 | -37 | 47.7% | -0.09 | 5–13 (28%) | 15–18 (45%) | — | +1.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 1769 | 147.8 | +0.06 | -0.05 | 0.985 | 49.5% | -45 | +47 | -48 | 45.9% | -0.14 | 8–9 (47%) | 8–19 (30%) | — | -1.66 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 1720 | 142.1 | -0.36 | +0.34 | 1.023 | 50.2% | -3 | +9 | +6 | 48.6% | -0.02 | 9–16 (36%) | 12–15 (44%) | — | -0.94 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1661 | 138.0 | +0.52 | +0.20 | 1.027 | 50.3% | +25 | +15 | +27 | 46.6% | -0.29 | 7–15 (32%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.13 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.11 | +2.59 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -125 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.28 |
| Career | — | 1942 | 149.6 | +0.12 | +0.65 | 1.020 | 50.2% | -9 | +8 | -50 | 48.8% | -0.05 | 54–76 (42%) | 82–99 (45%) | 92.2 | -0.94 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.94 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.55 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Sonego | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 4 | 3 | 7 | Mar 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Tommy Paul | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Yoshihito Nishioka | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 14, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |