H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Daniel Evans H2H: 2-1

Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 2–1 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniel Evans leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2025 Eastbourne Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Daniel Evans
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Evans #170 3-6 6-4 6-4 Miomir Kecmanovic #49 Match data Jun 25, 2025* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Miomir Kecmanovic #33 6-3 3-6 7-6(4) Daniel Evans #25 Match data Oct 7, 2022* R16 Japan Open ATP 500 Hard
Miomir Kecmanovic #48 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-4 Daniel Evans #27 Match data Jun 1, 2021* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #61 #27 1,458 1,942 176 193 47.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Evans #385 #21 2,195 1,926 141 161 46.7% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Daniel Evans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,522 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #477 1,465 0 0
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #261 1,442 0 0
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,811 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #363 1,504 0 0
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,681 0 1 2011 0–2 0.0% #342 1,489 0 0
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,880 0 1 2012 0–1 0.0% #297 1,533 0 0
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,682 0 1 2013 4–2 66.7% #150 1,692 0 0
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,769 0 1 2014 4–6 40.0% #305 1,679 0 0
25 2025 23–27 46.0% #51 1,719 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2026 15–24 38.5% #61 1,638 0 2 2016 9–8 52.9% #66 1,791 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2017 11–10 52.4% #133 1,820 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #192 1,787 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2019 18–18 50.0% #42 1,815 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2020 16–13 55.2% #32 1,857 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2021 23–22 51.1% #25 1,836 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2022 27–26 50.9% #27 1,848 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2023 15–23 39.5% #38 1,761 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2024 7–20 25.9% #164 1,707 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2025 7–6 53.8% #185 1,725 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Daniel Evans
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2013 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 11 15 26 42.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 22 16 38 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 6 11 17 35.3% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
Career — 114 122 236 48.3% 43 48 91 47.3% 19 23 42 45.2% — 102 97 199 51.3% 18 36 54 33.3% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 363/370 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 297/302 of Daniel Evans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Daniel Evans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% 2008 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.2% 48.3% 35.0% 28.6% — 42.9% 15.2%
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% 2009 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.3% 53.8% 30.3% 46.7% 100.0% 45.9% 29.7%
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% 2010 1/1 5.0 3.0 52.2% 60.0% 56.3% 20.0% 36.4% 58.2% 44.9%
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2011 2/2 7.5 10.0 63.8% 74.1% 53.8% 57.1% 52.4% 66.7% 33.8%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2012 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.0% 58.3% 59.4% 69.2% 75.0% 58.8% 42.0%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2013 6/6 7.2 4.7 60.9% 67.8% 50.3% 65.8% 44.6% 61.3% 40.9%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2014 10/10 7.5 3.3 58.8% 71.6% 51.0% 55.6% 34.0% 63.1% 33.8%
25 2025 46/50 5.2 2.6 61.7% 73.4% 49.8% 56.0% 42.4% 64.3% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 39/40 4.9 2.4 62.4% 73.0% 52.7% 55.1% 35.9% 65.4% 34.9% 2016 17/17 5.6 4.8 59.5% 70.2% 53.5% 63.1% 40.0% 63.5% 36.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 19/21 4.7 3.4 59.7% 71.7% 49.1% 53.3% 44.6% 62.0% 39.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 2.0 2.0 55.1% 73.5% 47.5% 66.7% 66.7% 61.8% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 36/36 3.7 2.7 63.2% 71.1% 52.5% 60.1% 40.7% 64.2% 37.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 29/29 4.1 2.5 59.3% 71.4% 51.9% 60.2% 41.1% 63.6% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 45/45 4.1 2.6 62.2% 70.4% 52.1% 64.4% 47.2% 63.5% 37.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 52/53 4.3 2.5 61.6% 71.6% 51.2% 54.9% 46.2% 64.1% 38.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/38 3.9 3.0 59.0% 72.1% 52.8% 61.9% 41.1% 64.1% 36.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 25/27 4.5 4.5 55.5% 70.8% 49.3% 61.2% 32.6% 61.0% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 13/13 3.6 3.1 56.8% 67.8% 47.6% 48.6% 43.1% 59.2% 34.5%
Career — 363/370 4.4 2.2 61.4% 70.7% 53.2% 57.5% 40.3% 63.9% 36.7% — 297/302 4.4 3.1 60.2% 70.8% 51.3% 59.1% 42.5% 63.1% 36.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Daniel Evans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2017 1523 108.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1482 97.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1523 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.14 2008 1465 96.1 -0.67 -0.93 0.265 31.7% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.06
19 2019 1738 136.0 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -45 -109 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.8 +0.34 2009 1442 94.1 +3.68 +2.34 0.549 39.5% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.15
20 2020 1811 152.0 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -34 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) 108.4 -1.24 2010 1505 103.0 +1.24 -0.01 1.074 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.12
21 2021 1681 139.9 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +40 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) 94.0 -0.07 2011 1490 102.4 +1.09 -0.34 1.014 49.8% — — — 28.6% 0.00 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) 105.6 -1.44 2012 1533 112.2 +0.20 -2.14 1.018 50.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — 0.00
23 2023 1682 143.3 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +72 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) 89.5 +1.58 2013 1692 123.6 -0.35 +1.64 1.058 51.1% -13 — -160 61.1% +0.33 1–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
24 2024 1769 147.8 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) 94.9 -1.66 2014 1679 121.9 -0.68 -1.14 0.915 48.4% +41 — -157 42.9% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -0.49
25 2025 1720 142.1 -0.36 +0.34 1.023 50.2% -3 +9 +6 48.6% -0.02 9–16 (36%) 12–15 (44%) 91.1 -0.94 2015 1685 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2026 1638 138.2 +0.21 -0.26 1.010 50.2% +19 +39 +50 45.9% -0.30 7–15 (32%) 9–9 (50%) 95.6 +0.36 2016 1792 134.4 +0.32 +0.67 0.994 50.2% -18 — -136 53.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 9–5 (64%) 101.1 -0.45
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1820 148.3 -1.83 +2.08 1.029 50.4% +56 -281 — 50.9% +0.03 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 105.8 -0.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1787 101.8 -0.92 -0.58 1.078 51.7% — — — 33.3% +0.67 0–1 — — +0.12
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1816 150.4 -0.19 +1.96 1.045 50.6% +43 — -139 51.5% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 10–7 (59%) 99.4 -1.00
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1857 155.8 +0.55 +1.27 1.013 50.3% +40 -315 — 50.6% +0.19 8–5 (62%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 -1.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1836 156.0 +0.36 +0.91 1.016 50.3% +15 -200 -81 51.6% +0.10 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 100.5 -1.12
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1848 156.2 +0.45 +2.12 1.064 51.0% +43 -209 -129 50.0% +0.12 6–7 (46%) 9–11 (45%) 97.9 +1.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1761 145.7 +0.74 +1.02 1.026 50.3% +32 -100 — 44.4% -0.27 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 +0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1708 133.1 -3.07 -0.42 0.891 48.0% +63 -124 — 37.0% -0.90 3–9 (25%) 5–11 (31%) 92.7 -0.57
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1726 118.5 -1.93 -0.59 0.845 47.4% -17 — -2 46.9% -0.41 4–0 (100%) 0–2 — -0.22
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1651 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1942 149.6 +0.09 +0.60 1.018 50.2% -9 +10 -47 48.7% -0.06 54–76 (42%) 82–100 (45%) 91.9 -0.87 — 1927 148.9 -0.19 +1.10 1.000 50.0% +35 -187 -101 48.2% -0.10 47–57 (45%) 60–70 (46%) 97.2 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.