H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Elias Ymer H2H: 1-0
Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2023 Stockholm quarterfinal 6-0 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2023* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 6-0 3-2 (ret.) | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2019* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Elias Ymer | 6-1 6-3 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Elias Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |