H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Facundo Bagnis H2H: 2-0
Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 2–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2021 Wimbledon first round 6-4 3-6 6-3 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Miomir Kecmanovic | 6-4 3-6 6-3 7-6(1) | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2021* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Facundo Bagnis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |