H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-1

Miomir Kecmanovic and Fernando Verdasco are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2021 Almaty Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miomir Kecmanovic #60 6-4 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #134 Match data Sep 23, 2021* R32 Almaty Open ATP 250 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #28 7-6(5) 6-3 6-3 Miomir Kecmanovic #125 Match data Jan 16, 2019* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #64 #27 1,458 1,942 175 191 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,522 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,811 0 1 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,681 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,880 0 1 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,682 0 1 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,769 0 1 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2
25 2025 23–27 46.0% #51 1,719 0 2 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3
26 2026 14–22 38.9% #64 1,660 0 2 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
25 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2026 10 13 23 43.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 120 233 48.5% 43 48 91 47.3% 19 23 42 45.2% — — — — — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0%
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4%
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3%
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8%
25 2025 46/50 5.2 2.6 61.7% 73.4% 49.8% 56.0% 42.4% 64.3% 36.6% 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1%
26 2026 36/36 4.9 2.6 62.1% 72.7% 53.9% 54.4% 37.9% 65.4% 35.5% 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0%
Career — 360/366 4.4 2.2 61.3% 70.6% 53.3% 57.4% 40.5% 63.9% 36.8% — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Fernando Verdasco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2017 1523 108.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 1523 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.14 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02
19 2019 1738 136.0 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -45 -109 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.8 +0.34 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 -0.48
20 2020 1811 152.0 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -34 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) 108.4 -1.24 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) 100.4 -1.34
21 2021 1681 139.9 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +40 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) 94.0 -0.07 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 100.7 -2.07
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) 105.6 -1.44 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 +0.48
23 2023 1682 143.3 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +72 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) 89.5 +1.58 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) 101.0 -1.77
24 2024 1769 147.8 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) 94.9 -1.66 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) 101.8 +1.79
25 2025 1720 142.1 -0.36 +0.34 1.023 50.2% -3 +9 +6 48.6% -0.02 9–16 (36%) 12–15 (44%) 91.1 -0.94 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) 96.0 -0.23
26 2026 1661 138.0 +0.54 +0.13 1.027 50.3% +26 +15 +27 46.6% -0.29 7–15 (32%) 9–8 (53%) 96.5 +0.13 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) 104.3 +1.41
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 97.4 -0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) 96.5 +0.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) 102.3 -0.19
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) 94.8 +1.67
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) 97.0 -2.42
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) 97.7 -1.95
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) 98.6 -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) 94.6 -1.33
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 96.5 -0.47
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.75
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
Career — 1942 149.6 +0.12 +0.65 1.020 50.2% -9 +8 -50 48.8% -0.05 54–76 (42%) 82–99 (45%) 92.2 -0.94 — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.