H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Nikoloz Basilashvili H2H: 1-0
Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Nikoloz Basilashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2022 Munich quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022* | Munich | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Miomir Kecmanovic | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Nikoloz Basilashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |