H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-1
Miomir Kecmanovic and Paolo Lorenzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2020 New York fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020* | New York | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 6-3 6-3 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 7-6(11) 6-7(2) 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |