H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Quentin Halys H2H: 1-1
Miomir Kecmanovic and Quentin Halys are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Quentin Halys leads 1–0 on clay, while Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2025 National Bank Open Presented by Rogers first round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
France
Age 29
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025* | National Bank Open Presented by Rogers | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Quentin Halys | Match data |
| May 29, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Quentin Halys | 4-6 6-3 7-6 7-5 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Quentin Halys | #90 | #46 | 1,174 | 1,815 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Quentin Halys | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #129 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #64 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #100 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #72 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |