H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Miomir Kecmanovic vs Richard Gasquet H2H: 1-1

Miomir Kecmanovic and Richard Gasquet are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Richard Gasquet leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gasquet won the 2022 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Miomir Kecmanovic
Serbia Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Richard Gasquet
France Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Gasquet #91 6-2 6-4 4-6 6-4 Miomir Kecmanovic #36 Match data Sep 1, 2022* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Miomir Kecmanovic #38 6-0 6-3 Richard Gasquet #82 Match data Apr 21, 2022* R32 Belgrade ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Miomir Kecmanovic #64 #27 1,458 1,942 175 191 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Richard Gasquet #448 #7 3,365 2,167 597 407 59.5% 0 0 0 0 16 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Richard Gasquet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2002 1–5 16.7% #161 1,486 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–8 20.0% #93 1,463 0 0
18 2018 0–2 0.0% #131 1,522 0 0 2004 13–15 46.4% #107 1,597 0 0
19 2019 22–20 52.4% #59 1,737 0 0 2005 30–10 75.0% #16 1,852 0 1
20 2020 17–12 58.6% #44 1,811 0 1 2006 33–20 62.3% #18 1,942 0 4
21 2021 14–25 35.9% #69 1,681 0 1 2007 47–24 66.2% #8 1,943 0 5
22 2022 37–24 60.7% #29 1,880 0 1 2008 31–21 59.6% #25 1,872 0 5
23 2023 24–30 44.4% #54 1,682 0 1 2009 23–15 60.5% #52 1,847 0 5
24 2024 24–29 45.3% #54 1,769 0 1 2010 38–24 61.3% #30 1,918 0 6
25 2025 23–27 46.0% #51 1,719 0 2 2011 34–18 65.4% #19 1,987 0 6
26 2026 14–22 38.9% #64 1,660 0 2 2012 42–22 65.6% #10 1,994 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 2013 48–23 67.6% #9 2,046 0 10
28 — — — — — — — 2014 29–19 60.4% #26 1,942 0 10
29 — — — — — — — 2015 43–17 71.7% #9 2,130 0 12
30 — — — — — — — 2016 33–17 66.0% #18 1,997 0 14
31 — — — — — — — 2017 28–18 60.9% #31 1,956 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2018 34–23 59.6% #26 1,946 0 15
33 — — — — — — — 2019 17–18 48.6% #61 1,854 0 15
34 — — — — — — — 2020 10–10 50.0% #47 1,827 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2021 14–17 45.2% #87 1,780 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2022 24–19 55.8% #68 1,862 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2023 15–25 37.5% #76 1,629 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2024 4–14 22.2% #129 1,619 0 16
39 — — — — — — — 2025 4–5 44.4% #313 1,635 0 16

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Richard Gasquet
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2019 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2005 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
20 2020 12 10 22 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
21 2021 8 15 23 34.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 27 14 41 65.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2022 22 13 35 62.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 17 12 29 58.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2023 13 17 30 43.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2009 20 13 33 60.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2024 14 19 33 42.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2010 20 15 35 57.1% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2025 19 18 37 51.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 20 12 32 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 2026 10 13 23 43.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 27 15 42 64.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 37 16 53 69.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 23 15 38 60.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 27 12 39 69.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 21 11 32 65.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 17 13 30 56.7% 13 8 21 61.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 8 8 16 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 13 11 24 54.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 11 13 24 45.8% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 120 233 48.5% 43 48 91 47.3% 19 23 42 45.2% — — — — — 350 244 594 58.9% 163 115 278 58.6% 75 42 117 64.1% 9 6 15 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 360/366 of Miomir Kecmanovic's and 988/1,004 of Richard Gasquet's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Richard Gasquet
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 5/6 2.2 3.6 59.7% 64.0% 39.6% 50.3% 56.3% 54.8% 29.6%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 10/10 4.5 4.2 56.1% 67.9% 45.5% 52.3% 36.8% 58.1% 33.6%
18 2018 2/2 2.0 4.0 54.9% 68.6% 48.8% 61.8% 66.7% 59.6% 30.7% 2004 28/28 4.8 3.7 55.6% 73.3% 50.0% 54.3% 39.9% 62.7% 37.7%
19 2019 42/42 3.7 2.3 61.7% 72.2% 55.9% 59.9% 36.4% 65.9% 35.8% 2005 40/40 4.6 2.5 63.2% 75.4% 56.5% 64.3% 49.5% 68.7% 42.6%
20 2020 29/29 5.1 2.7 56.8% 71.1% 52.0% 61.8% 45.0% 62.8% 38.1% 2006 52/53 4.8 2.3 63.7% 73.9% 52.8% 63.2% 41.8% 66.2% 39.2%
21 2021 37/39 4.1 2.4 61.3% 66.1% 52.4% 53.5% 38.6% 60.6% 36.8% 2007 70/71 5.4 2.2 61.6% 74.1% 54.4% 54.5% 48.4% 66.5% 40.6%
22 2022 61/61 3.7 1.5 62.8% 69.6% 54.7% 58.7% 42.9% 64.2% 38.9% 2008 52/52 8.4 2.4 60.0% 76.7% 53.5% 57.1% 41.6% 67.4% 37.7%
23 2023 54/54 4.3 1.9 60.8% 69.7% 54.3% 60.4% 41.5% 63.7% 37.1% 2009 37/38 7.2 3.3 58.1% 72.3% 51.0% 63.3% 38.3% 63.4% 37.1%
24 2024 53/53 4.6 2.1 61.8% 70.6% 53.0% 54.7% 38.0% 64.0% 35.5% 2010 60/62 5.8 2.7 61.8% 74.5% 54.7% 64.0% 42.0% 66.9% 37.8%
25 2025 46/50 5.2 2.6 61.7% 73.4% 49.8% 56.0% 42.4% 64.3% 36.6% 2011 51/52 5.6 2.2 63.7% 72.8% 52.8% 60.2% 42.3% 65.6% 38.9%
26 2026 36/36 4.9 2.6 62.1% 72.7% 53.9% 54.4% 37.9% 65.4% 35.5% 2012 62/64 5.4 2.0 63.1% 73.2% 56.4% 58.8% 43.2% 66.9% 39.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 71/71 6.1 2.7 60.4% 74.1% 55.0% 59.8% 41.6% 66.3% 39.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 47/48 5.8 1.7 65.1% 72.8% 57.3% 54.4% 42.6% 67.2% 36.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 60/60 5.5 1.8 63.4% 76.3% 55.8% 61.9% 48.1% 68.9% 38.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 50/50 3.7 1.9 61.9% 71.5% 53.4% 60.0% 48.8% 64.7% 40.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/46 3.1 2.0 62.5% 72.5% 52.7% 59.9% 46.0% 65.1% 38.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 56/57 5.5 2.1 61.5% 71.3% 51.9% 52.8% 44.2% 64.0% 38.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 6.1 3.1 61.0% 72.7% 49.3% 57.8% 37.9% 63.6% 34.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 20/20 4.6 2.5 60.0% 72.3% 52.4% 59.8% 41.1% 64.2% 34.4%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 29/31 3.4 3.0 58.7% 69.6% 52.5% 50.0% 36.0% 62.3% 34.4%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 43/43 5.1 3.7 58.3% 71.4% 52.4% 58.2% 39.4% 63.0% 36.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/40 5.0 2.9 57.8% 70.9% 50.6% 56.4% 42.2% 62.4% 35.5%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 18/18 4.4 2.4 57.2% 71.5% 53.0% 52.8% 23.5% 63.8% 31.1%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 9/9 3.0 3.7 56.6% 71.2% 49.2% 48.3% 36.2% 61.3% 38.3%
Career — 360/366 4.4 2.2 61.3% 70.6% 53.3% 57.4% 40.5% 63.9% 36.8% — 988/1,004 5.3 2.5 61.2% 73.1% 53.4% 58.4% 42.8% 65.5% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Miomir Kecmanovic Richard Gasquet
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1487 119.7 -0.88 -2.02 0.654 43.2% — +45 — 28.6% -1.43 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.22
17 2017 1523 108.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1464 108.5 -1.22 -3.66 0.802 46.1% +15 — — 35.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.06
18 2018 1523 109.1 -2.34 -0.04 0.761 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — -0.14 2004 1598 134.4 +0.68 +0.33 1.010 49.9% -88 +43 — 47.8% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 6–11 (35%) 98.0 +0.35
19 2019 1738 136.0 +1.11 +0.25 1.049 50.7% -45 -109 -70 49.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 10–15 (40%) 99.8 +0.34 2005 1853 149.2 +5.23 +5.39 1.360 55.3% -193 -39 -28 64.4% +1.12 8–3 (73%) 11–9 (55%) 111.0 +1.52
20 2020 1811 152.0 +0.41 +0.92 1.024 50.6% -34 -102 — 50.0% +0.04 7–1 (88%) 4–4 (50%) 108.4 -1.24 2006 1943 156.3 +3.83 +2.24 1.161 52.4% -72 -97 -29 62.5% +0.91 6–7 (46%) 10–6 (63%) 103.9 -1.51
21 2021 1681 139.9 -2.18 -0.06 0.934 48.6% -2 +40 -20 43.4% -0.55 4–12 (25%) 10–8 (56%) 94.0 -0.07 2007 1943 155.4 +3.41 +3.74 1.214 53.4% -19 -91 +81 65.9% +1.08 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) 97.0 +1.61
22 2022 1880 158.3 +1.28 +2.51 1.087 51.3% +3 -38 -181 57.9% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 14–12 (54%) 105.6 -1.44 2008 1873 150.1 +3.66 +1.51 1.155 52.4% +5 -37 +152 58.3% +0.73 7–11 (39%) 9–12 (43%) 91.6 +0.90
23 2023 1682 143.3 -0.28 +0.50 1.022 50.3% +34 +72 -37 47.7% -0.09 5–13 (28%) 15–18 (45%) 89.5 +1.58 2009 1848 149.0 +0.29 +1.36 1.015 50.2% +4 -13 — 54.2% +0.19 11–5 (69%) 10–6 (63%) 104.5 -0.85
24 2024 1769 147.8 +0.06 -0.05 0.985 49.5% -45 +47 -48 45.9% -0.14 8–9 (47%) 8–19 (30%) 94.9 -1.66 2010 1918 155.1 +3.11 +1.40 1.143 52.2% -23 -1 — 61.0% +0.78 12–8 (60%) 16–15 (52%) 100.5 0.00
25 2025 1720 142.1 -0.36 +0.34 1.023 50.2% -3 +9 +6 48.6% -0.02 9–16 (36%) 12–15 (44%) 91.1 -0.94 2011 1988 167.4 +3.13 +2.71 1.132 52.4% -46 +73 +120 62.4% +0.91 7–2 (78%) 9–7 (56%) 106.4 +0.44
26 2026 1661 138.0 +0.54 +0.13 1.027 50.3% +26 +15 +27 46.6% -0.29 7–15 (32%) 9–8 (53%) 96.5 +0.13 2012 1994 163.9 +4.12 +2.23 1.183 52.8% -11 +103 +57 62.5% +1.04 10–5 (67%) 9–11 (45%) 98.3 +2.77
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2047 171.5 +3.13 +3.52 1.172 52.4% +63 -22 -16 62.9% +0.88 14–8 (64%) 15–14 (52%) 101.5 +2.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1943 155.4 +2.66 +0.65 1.097 51.6% +48 +77 +40 59.5% +0.45 4–3 (57%) 15–5 (75%) 103.8 +1.40
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2131 168.9 +4.39 +4.09 1.241 53.7% -20 -28 -21 65.8% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 17–11 (61%) 103.2 -2.22
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1997 160.4 +1.07 +4.24 1.159 52.5% -13 +138 +75 65.0% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 11–3 (79%) 103.0 +1.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1957 159.4 +1.64 +3.20 1.115 51.9% +3 +83 +33 57.6% +0.76 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 99.0 -0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1946 159.9 +0.49 +2.56 1.078 51.2% -14 +68 +38 58.8% +0.63 7–3 (70%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1854 143.3 +0.23 -0.88 0.947 49.1% +17 +41 +67 49.4% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 12–6 (67%) 100.3 -0.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1828 145.2 +1.00 -1.54 0.959 49.6% +19 — — 54.2% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 100.0 -0.26
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1780 140.9 -0.22 -1.71 0.914 48.5% +24 +86 — 47.1% -0.47 3–3 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 99.3 -0.21
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1863 144.7 -0.23 +0.37 1.000 49.9% -15 -46 +80 54.1% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 11–11 (50%) 99.4 -2.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1630 129.6 -1.55 +0.19 0.944 48.9% +94 +11 +193 39.4% -0.58 8–9 (47%) 10–7 (59%) 101.0 +0.23
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1620 129.6 +0.21 -2.21 0.861 46.9% +35 +35 — 24.4% -1.32 1–1 5–7 (42%) — -1.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1635 123.9 -0.95 +1.79 0.991 50.0% -17 +46 — 46.2% -0.08 2–3 (40%) — — -0.03
Career — 1942 149.6 +0.12 +0.65 1.020 50.2% -9 +8 -50 48.8% -0.05 54–76 (42%) 82–99 (45%) 92.2 -0.94 — 2167 162.1 +2.19 +1.99 1.103 51.6% -3 +18 +49 57.9% +0.55 160–120 (57%) 220–188 (54%) 103.6 +0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.