H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Stefano Travaglia H2H: 1-1
Miomir Kecmanovic and Stefano Travaglia are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2022 Sydney third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2022* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Miomir Kecmanovic | 6-2 6-3 | Stefano Travaglia | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2021* | Antalya | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Stefano Travaglia | 1-6 6-4 6-0 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stefano Travaglia | #150 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,806 | 29 | 56 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Stefano Travaglia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #134 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #310 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |