H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Yannick Hanfmann H2H: 1-0
Miomir Kecmanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Yannick Hanfmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miomir Kecmanovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Miomir Kecmanovic won the 2020 Kitzbuhel final 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 26
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 34
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2023* | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Yannick Hanfmann | 6-1 6-4 | Miomir Kecmanovic | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2020* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Miomir Kecmanovic | 6-4 6-4 | Yannick Hanfmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miomir Kecmanovic | #59 | #27 | 1,458 | 1,943 | 174 | 186 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yannick Hanfmann | #51 | #45 | 974 | 1,865 | 97 | 107 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Miomir Kecmanovic | Yannick Hanfmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #44 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #69 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,879 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 24–30 | 44.4% | #54 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #54 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #51 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #119 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #59 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #99 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #126 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #96 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |