H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Mitchell Krueger vs Vasek Pospisil
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Mitchell Krueger vs Vasek Pospisil.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 32
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell Krueger | #364 | #135 | 462 | 1,688 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mitchell Krueger | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #228 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #206 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |