H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Naomi Uemura vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 0-1

Tim Gullikson holds a 1–0 lead over Naomi Uemura in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Gullikson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tim Gullikson won the 1981 Japan Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Uemura
JPN Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tim Gullikson
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Gullikson 6-2 6-2 Naomi Uemura Match data Oct 21, 1981* R64 Japan Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Uemura #806 #725 0 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tim Gullikson — — — 2,012 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Naomi Uemura Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
1984 0–1 0.0% #745 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Naomi Uemura Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — Career 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Naomi Uemura Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1981 1496 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.18 1975 1526 110.0 — — — — +36 — — 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.56
1984 1480 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 1976 1587 121.0 — — — — -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.26
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1869 146.4 — — — — -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1956 150.8 — — — — +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1983 152.5 — — — — +54 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1880 148.2 — — — — +25 — +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1868 150.9 — — — — +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1729 145.3 — — — — +53 — +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1759 134.2 — — — — +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1613 132.9 — — — — +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1585 121.6 — — — — +9 — +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1583 108.2 — — — — -10 — — 22.2% -1.89 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.44
Career 1500 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -1.00 Career 2013 149.7 — — — — +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.