H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathan Healey vs Flavio Saretta H2H: 1-0
Nathan Healey holds a 1–0 lead over Flavio Saretta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathan Healey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathan Healey won the 2005 Australian Open first round 4-6 4-6 6-1 5-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 46
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nathan Healey | 4-6 4-6 6-1 5-0 (ret.) | Flavio Saretta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan Healey | #1,134 | #159 | 268 | 1,579 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavio Saretta | #950 | #44 | 839 | 1,792 | 68 | 74 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathan Healey | Flavio Saretta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #98 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #111 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #241 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #118 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #188 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |