H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nduka Odizor vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 1-0

Nduka Odizor holds a 1–0 lead over Jay Lapidus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nduka Odizor leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nduka Odizor won the 1982 Newport quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-3.

NGR Age 68 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nduka Odizor #77 4-6 7-5 6-3 Jay Lapidus Match data Jul 10, 1982* QF Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nduka Odizor #1,165 #52 186 1,730 81 121 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jay Lapidus #621 #34 0 1,780 76 106 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nduka Odizor Jay Lapidus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1978 0–1 0.0% #272 1,494 0 0
20 1979 6–6 50.0% #184 1,560 0 0
21 1980 0–1 0.0% #457 1,489 0 0 1980 2–7 22.2% #283 1,548 0 0
22 1981 3–3 50.0% 1,537 0 0 1981 9–12 42.9% 1,609 0 0
23 1982 13–16 44.8% #81 1,590 0 0 1982 26–17 60.5% #40 1,760 0 1
24 1983 19–20 48.7% #65 1,683 0 1 1983 0–7 0.0% #81 1,623 0 1
25 1984 9–13 40.9% #108 1,591 0 1 1984 13–12 52.0% #65 1,669 0 1
26 1985 9–13 40.9% #108 1,620 0 1 1985 11–25 30.6% #150 1,621 0 1
27 1986 5–14 26.3% #75 1,553 0 1 1986 5–7 41.7% #145 1,625 0 1
28 1987 16–19 45.7% #98 1,624 0 1 1987 4–12 25.0% #234 1,550 0 1
29 1988 1–7 12.5% #195 1,550 0 1
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #245 1,530 0 1
31 1990 3–5 37.5% #186 1,523 0 1
32 1991 0–1 0.0% #266 1,508 0 1
33 1992 0–2 0.0% #551 1,478 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nduka Odizor Jay Lapidus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 16 7 23 69.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1984 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 3 12 15 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1987 9 12 21 42.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1988 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1989 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 32 59 91 35.2% 5 12 17 29.4% 31 30 61 50.8% 13 20 33 39.4% 36 45 81 44.4% 17 26 43 39.5% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 13 20 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nduka Odizor Jay Lapidus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1978 1494 100.9 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 -0.10
20 1979 1560 123.2 +34 48.1% -0.78 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) +0.12
21 1980 1489 99.3 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 +0.06 1980 1548 114.6 -27 -18 34.8% -1.26 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) -0.54
22 1981 1538 117.4 +36 50.0% -0.14 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.10 1981 1609 120.7 -79 +4 43.9% -0.79 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) -0.65
23 1982 1591 118.9 -27 -28 +1 43.2% -0.66 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) +0.74 1982 1760 131.6 -34 -136 -200 57.0% +0.20 6–4 (60%) 8–4 (67%) +1.42
24 1983 1684 129.3 +17 -25 45.2% -0.54 11–4 (73%) 10–6 (63%) +2.13 1983 1624 105.1 -6 15.8% -2.31 0–2 2–0 -0.08
25 1984 1592 117.3 +11 +105 48.0% -0.36 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) +0.89 1984 1670 120.2 +11 -60 -141 54.4% +0.40 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) +1.43
26 1985 1620 126.2 -28 +128 45.2% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 9–8 (53%) +1.02 1985 1622 129.4 -58 -59 +6 35.4% -0.88 5–7 (42%) 5–9 (36%) -1.39
27 1986 1554 119.3 +28 -96 +112 37.7% -0.83 1–6 (14%) 7–6 (54%) +0.16 1986 1625 117.1 -69 +27 45.5% -0.30 2–2 (50%) 4–2 (67%) +0.19
28 1987 1625 129.3 +3 +43 43.8% -0.52 6–3 (67%) 12–4 (75%) +0.78 1987 1551 114.3 -8 +42 32.5% -1.10 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) -0.11
29 1988 1550 100.4 +2 21.7% -2.13 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) -0.26
30 1989 1531 107.3 +9 28.0% -1.56 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) -0.04
31 1990 1524 116.9 +23 52.6% +0.21 0–2 3–1 (75%) +0.74
32 1991 1509 99.2 -0.45 +0.60 0.633 44.1% 0.0% -2.00 -0.07
33 1992 1478 97.4 -2.56 -2.02 0.819 45.2% 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 +0.37
Career 1730 127.6 -1.86 -1.15 0.765 44.8% +6 -44 +57 42.3% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 60–47 (56%) 107.9 +3.28 1781 129.6 -37 -35 -56 44.0% -0.52 23–31 (43%) 32–27 (54%) 102.4 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.