H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Nduka Odizor vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 0-2

Mark Kratzmann holds a 2–0 lead over Nduka Odizor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Kratzmann leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Kratzmann won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 4-6 6-3 7-6 4-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nduka Odizor
NGR Age 68 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mark Kratzmann
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Kratzmann #123 4-6 6-3 7-6 4-6 8-6 Nduka Odizor #91 Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mark Kratzmann #268 6-3 7-6 Nduka Odizor #86 Match data Oct 10, 1985* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nduka Odizor #1,165 #52 186 1,730 81 121 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mark Kratzmann #1,147 #50 557 1,751 60 96 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nduka Odizor Mark Kratzmann
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,453 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 1–3 25.0% #616 1,474 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1984 2–6 25.0% #246 1,477 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1985 4–3 57.1% #209 1,534 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1986 5–10 33.3% #142 1,545 0 0
21 1980 0–1 0.0% #457 1,489 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% #182 1,543 0 0
22 1981 3–3 50.0% — 1,537 0 0 1988 3–6 33.3% #150 1,540 0 0
23 1982 13–16 44.8% #81 1,590 0 0 1989 11–14 44.0% #122 1,604 0 0
24 1983 19–20 48.7% #65 1,683 0 1 1990 21–23 47.7% #75 1,623 0 0
25 1984 9–13 40.9% #108 1,591 0 1 1991 5–13 27.8% #208 1,539 0 0
26 1985 9–13 40.9% #108 1,620 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #572 1,528 0 0
27 1986 5–14 26.3% #75 1,553 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1987 16–19 45.7% #98 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1988 1–7 12.5% #195 1,550 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1989 3–7 30.0% #245 1,530 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1990 3–5 37.5% #186 1,523 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1991 0–1 0.0% #266 1,508 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1992 0–2 0.0% #551 1,478 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nduka Odizor Mark Kratzmann
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1981 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1982 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1990 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1984 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 32 59 91 35.2% 5 12 17 29.4% 31 30 61 50.8% 13 20 33 39.4% — 27 52 79 34.2% 1 9 10 10.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nduka Odizor Mark Kratzmann
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1454 97.6 — — — — — — +22 30.0% -1.60 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.29
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1475 108.3 — — — — — — +37 41.7% -0.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1477 107.1 — — — — — — +37 33.3% -0.83 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1535 111.3 — — — — -40 — +64 53.3% +0.13 1–0 1–1 — +0.60
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1546 125.6 — — — — -44 -64 +92 42.6% -0.30 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.02
21 1980 1489 99.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.06 1987 1543 116.1 — — — — -70 -95 +168 40.7% -0.76 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.8 +0.07
22 1981 1538 117.4 — — — — +36 — — 50.0% -0.14 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.10 1988 1541 105.8 — — — — -52 — — 33.3% -0.96 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.35
23 1982 1591 118.9 — — — — -27 -28 +1 43.2% -0.66 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 103.9 +0.74 1989 1605 130.8 — — — — -25 — +108 47.2% -0.24 3–8 (27%) 11–7 (61%) 101.0 -1.10
24 1983 1684 129.3 — — — — +17 — -25 45.2% -0.54 11–4 (73%) 10–6 (63%) 113.9 +2.13 1990 1624 128.1 — — — — +17 — +93 44.6% -0.55 11–7 (61%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 -0.25
25 1984 1592 117.3 — — — — +11 — +105 48.0% -0.36 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) 95.3 +0.89 1991 1539 113.9 -0.13 -3.85 0.855 47.8% +3 — +151 35.4% -0.92 3–6 (33%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 +0.30
26 1985 1620 126.2 — — — — -28 — +128 45.2% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 9–8 (53%) 99.3 +1.02 1992 1529 103.1 -0.28 -0.21 0.785 46.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
27 1986 1554 119.3 — — — — +28 -96 +112 37.7% -0.83 1–6 (14%) 7–6 (54%) 95.1 +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1987 1625 129.3 — — — — +3 — +43 43.8% -0.52 6–3 (67%) 12–4 (75%) 110.9 +0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1988 1550 100.4 — — — — +2 — — 21.7% -2.13 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.0 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1989 1531 107.3 — — — — +9 — — 28.0% -1.56 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 104.3 -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1990 1524 116.9 — — — — +23 — — 52.6% +0.21 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1991 1509 99.2 -0.45 +0.60 0.633 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1992 1478 97.4 -2.56 -2.02 0.819 45.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1730 127.6 -1.86 -1.15 0.765 44.8% +6 -44 +57 42.3% -0.64 34–33 (51%) 60–47 (56%) 107.9 +3.28 — 1752 126.5 -0.14 -3.62 0.850 47.7% -15 -77 +101 41.8% -0.59 25–36 (41%) 37–38 (49%) 99.7 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.