H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nduka Odizor vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 1-0
Nduka Odizor holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nduka Odizor leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nduka Odizor won the 1983 Dallas third round 1-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NGR
Age 67
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1983* | Dallas | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nduka Odizor | 1-6 6-3 7-6 | Paul Mcnamee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nduka Odizor | #1,165 | #52 | 186 | 1,729 | 81 | 120 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nduka Odizor | Paul Mcnamee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #457 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1982 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #81 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1983 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #65 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #108 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1985 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #108 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1986 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #75 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #98 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #195 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #245 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1990 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,481 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |