H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Neale Fraser vs Nick Fleury H2H: 1-0

Neale Fraser holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Fleury in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neale Fraser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neale Fraser won the 1972 Dutch Open round of 64 6-2 6-2.

AUS Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neale Fraser 6-2 6-2 Nick Fleury Match data Aug 3, 1972* R64 Dutch Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Neale Fraser #326 #188 0 1,562 13 21 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nick Fleury — — — 1,500 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Neale Fraser Nick Fleury
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
34 1968 2–1 66.7% — 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 1972 7–8 46.7% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
39 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 1974 2–4 33.3% #188 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
41 1975 0–2 0.0% #308 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
46 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Neale Fraser Nick Fleury
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1483 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.08
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1479 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1472 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.12
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1459 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1448 90.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1445 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
34 1968 1522 107.9 — — — — — — +33 61.5% +1.15 1–1 — — +0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1969 1506 101.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1971 1505 101.6 — — — — — — — 75.0% +2.25 — 1–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1972 1541 103.7 — — — — +45 -18 +8 51.3% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +1.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1973 1487 96.5 — — — — — — — 22.2% -1.44 — — — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1974 1482 102.0 — — — — — +15 -13 46.7% -0.20 1–1 0–1 — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1975 1462 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.34 — 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
46 1980 1448 99.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1563 105.2 — — — — +45 -2 +9 45.2% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 97.0 +12.18 — 1500 90.2 — — — — — — — 7.7% -3.39 0–1 — — -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.