H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Neville Godwin vs Chris Pridham H2H: 0-1
Chris Pridham holds a 1–0 lead over Neville Godwin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Pridham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Pridham won the 1992 Johannesburg third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1992* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Pridham | 6-2 7-6(3) | Neville Godwin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,670 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Pridham | #1,219 | #75 | 433 | 1,649 | 51 | 74 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Chris Pridham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #137 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #155 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #131 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #145 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |