H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Eyal Ran holds a 1–0 lead over Neville Godwin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eyal Ran leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eyal Ran won the 1995 Miami Open round of 128 1-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eyal Ran | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Neville Godwin | Match data | Mar 14, 1995* | R128 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,669 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eyal Ran | #1,153 | #138 | 315 | 1,530 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Eyal Ran | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #732 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #187 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #193 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #230 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Eyal Ran | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1998 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1997 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2000 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 17 | 33 | 50 | 34.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 10 | 20 | 30 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 71/85 of Neville Godwin's and 36/42 of Eyal Ran's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Eyal Ran | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1992 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 50.6% | 74.4% | 42.1% | 66.7% | 16.7% | 58.4% | 32.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 37.0% | 70.6% | 53.4% | 63.6% | 26.7% | 59.8% | 44.4% | 1992 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 49.2% | 63.3% | 38.7% | 42.9% | 100.0% | 50.8% | 28.6% |
| 20 | 1995 | 4/5 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 59.1% | 64.3% | 49.1% | 64.9% | 36.5% | 58.1% | 37.3% | 1993 | 4/4 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 55.6% | 67.0% | 57.9% | 51.7% | 38.7% | 63.7% | 41.3% |
| 21 | 1996 | 11/13 | 7.4 | 5.5 | 50.8% | 71.4% | 46.3% | 60.9% | 49.9% | 58.9% | 35.4% | 1994 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 57.7% | 48.6% | 28.6% | 71.4% | 54.0% | 38.7% |
| 22 | 1997 | 15/20 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 55.3% | 73.4% | 46.6% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 61.9% | 36.4% | 1995 | 5/6 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 49.5% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 43.7% | 31.3% | 57.5% | 43.4% |
| 23 | 1998 | 13/14 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 55.4% | 70.4% | 43.7% | 63.1% | 42.4% | 58.7% | 36.1% | 1996 | 7/8 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 61.1% | 62.9% | 46.5% | 58.4% | 48.0% | 57.7% | 44.2% |
| 24 | 1999 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 6.0 | 51.4% | 66.2% | 48.4% | 35.6% | 53.7% | 57.6% | 38.2% | 1997 | 14/17 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 57.8% | 66.8% | 46.7% | 55.0% | 47.8% | 58.3% | 33.8% |
| 25 | 2000 | 6/7 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 53.3% | 75.9% | 47.1% | 61.4% | 64.2% | 62.5% | 34.8% | 1998 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 55.1% | 58.2% | 45.9% | 49.3% | 38.9% | 51.6% | 40.8% |
| 26 | 2001 | 10/12 | 3.8 | 5.9 | 54.5% | 72.5% | 51.0% | 67.8% | 51.1% | 62.9% | 35.0% | 1999 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 58.3% | 71.4% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 58.3% | 25.5% |
| 27 | 2002 | 7/9 | 3.6 | 4.9 | 55.7% | 69.9% | 39.6% | 47.1% | 38.2% | 56.2% | 38.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 71/85 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 54.1% | 71.4% | 46.2% | 58.2% | 45.7% | 60.0% | 36.3% | — | 36/43 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 56.6% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 52.0% | 44.6% | 57.8% | 38.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Eyal Ran | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1992 | 1484 | 97.9 | -2.47 | -0.18 | 0.770 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.18 | 1990 | 1484 | 95.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1468 | 98.1 | 0.00 | -1.69 | 1.105 | 51.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.24 | 1992 | 1475 | 100.8 | -0.97 | -1.74 | 0.581 | 40.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1475 | 102.5 | -1.33 | -1.24 | 0.891 | 47.8% | +21 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.47 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.50 | 1993 | 1507 | 118.5 | +2.10 | +0.80 | 1.139 | 52.6% | +24 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.78 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.06 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1595 | 121.4 | -1.47 | -0.05 | 0.861 | 47.4% | -44 | — | +97 | 50.0% | -0.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–0 (100%) | 104.0 | +0.40 | 1994 | 1501 | 105.1 | +1.56 | -1.00 | 0.841 | 46.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1549 | 118.2 | -0.65 | +0.07 | 0.955 | 49.1% | +12 | — | +124 | 40.0% | -0.22 | 2–2 (50%) | 4–9 (31%) | 96.8 | +1.06 | 1995 | 1493 | 108.4 | -1.40 | +0.32 | 1.023 | 50.6% | +31 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.57 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1582 | 111.8 | -2.26 | -0.48 | 0.875 | 47.6% | -21 | — | +121 | 42.9% | -0.54 | 5–1 (83%) | 3–2 (60%) | 105.4 | +1.25 | 1996 | 1507 | 112.1 | -2.13 | +2.24 | 1.046 | 51.2% | +17 | +14 | — | 45.5% | +0.14 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.47 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1568 | 102.9 | -2.65 | +1.66 | 0.900 | 48.3% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.33 | 1997 | 1473 | 104.6 | -2.39 | -2.97 | 0.811 | 46.5% | +35 | — | — | 31.6% | -1.34 | 0–3 (0%) | 5–3 (63%) | 98.3 | +1.41 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1616 | 116.4 | +0.81 | -0.99 | 0.928 | 48.8% | -57 | — | +95 | 45.5% | -0.05 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.11 | 1998 | 1465 | 101.6 | -3.18 | -0.50 | 0.843 | 46.0% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1578 | 110.6 | -0.58 | -1.74 | 0.944 | 49.2% | -112 | — | +212 | 46.9% | -0.06 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.0 | +1.24 | 1999 | 1449 | 95.7 | -3.35 | +1.13 | 0.611 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.25 |
| 27 | 2002 | 1489 | 103.3 | -2.83 | -0.17 | 0.890 | 47.4% | -52 | — | +200 | 28.6% | -1.48 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.0 | -0.29 | 2000 | 1435 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 1503 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1670 | 117.3 | -1.29 | -0.45 | 0.907 | 48.2% | -27 | — | +148 | 42.0% | -0.43 | 17–15 (53%) | 19–23 (45%) | 100.0 | +5.65 | — | 1531 | 111.0 | -1.65 | -0.67 | 0.909 | 48.3% | +31 | +14 | — | 35.0% | -0.81 | 2–8 (20%) | 5–7 (42%) | 92.9 | +6.19 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Carlsen | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 14, 2001 | H2H |
| Lars Burgsmuller | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 14, 2002 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 13, 2000 | H2H |
| Gaston Etlis | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 17, 1998 | H2H |
| Justin Gimelstob | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 11, 1998 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcos Ondruska | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 22, 1998 | H2H |
| Patrick Rafter | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 11, 1997 | H2H |
| Peter Wessels | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 8, 1999 | H2H |
| Tim Henman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 18, 1998 | H2H |
| Petr Luxa | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 17, 1998 | H2H |