H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Neville Godwin vs Mark Petchey H2H: 1-0
Neville Godwin holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Petchey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neville Godwin won the 1995 Johannesburg fourth round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1995* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Neville Godwin | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Mark Petchey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,670 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Petchey | #1,313 | #80 | 552 | 1,597 | 34 | 64 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Neville Godwin | Mark Petchey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #240 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #120 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #212 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |