H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Neville Godwin vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Neville Godwin holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neville Godwin won the 1997 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Neville Godwin
RSA Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neville Godwin #91 6-4 6-3 Martin Damm Sr Match data Apr 10, 1997* R32 Hong Kong Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Neville Godwin #812 #90 515 1,669 34 51 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Neville Godwin Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1992 0–1 0.0% #487 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
1994 0–1 0.0% #275 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
1995 2–3 40.0% #208 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
1996 7–6 53.8% #111 1,594 0 0 — — — — — — —
1997 7–13 35.0% #180 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
1998 7–7 50.0% #150 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
1999 1–2 33.3% #210 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
2000 3–4 42.9% #123 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 5–7 41.7% #128 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
2002 2–7 22.2% #207 1,488 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Neville Godwin Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1995 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1997 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1998 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
2001 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 17 33 50 34.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 1 3 4 25.0% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Neville Godwin Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1992 1484 97.9 -2.47 -0.18 0.770 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.18 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
1994 1468 98.1 0.00 -1.69 1.105 51.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.24 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
1995 1475 102.5 -1.33 -1.24 0.891 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.50 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
1996 1595 121.4 -1.47 -0.05 0.861 47.4% -44 — +97 50.0% -0.44 2–2 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 104.0 +0.40 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1997 1549 118.2 -0.65 +0.07 0.955 49.1% +12 — +124 40.0% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 96.8 +1.06 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1998 1582 111.8 -2.26 -0.48 0.875 47.6% -21 — +121 42.9% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +1.25 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1999 1568 102.9 -2.65 +1.66 0.900 48.3% — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.33 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2000 1616 116.4 +0.81 -0.99 0.928 48.8% -57 — +95 45.5% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.11 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2001 1578 110.6 -0.58 -1.74 0.944 49.2% -112 — +212 46.9% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.0 +1.24 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
2002 1489 103.3 -2.83 -0.17 0.890 47.4% -52 — +200 28.6% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 -0.29 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
2003 1503 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1670 117.3 -1.29 -0.45 0.907 48.2% -27 — +148 42.0% -0.43 17–15 (53%) 19–23 (45%) 100.0 +5.65 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.