H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nick Fulwood vs Huub Van Boeckel H2H: 1-0

Nick Fulwood holds a 1–0 lead over Huub Van Boeckel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Fulwood leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nick Fulwood won the 1987 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 6-4 7-5.

GBR Age 62 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 66 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nick Fulwood #245 6-3 6-4 7-5 Huub Van Boeckel Match data Jan 14, 1987* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nick Fulwood #815 #176 59 1,507 5 13 27.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Huub Van Boeckel 1,581 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nick Fulwood Huub Van Boeckel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1984 0–1 0.0% #555 1,473 0 0
21 1985 0–4 0.0% #376 1,440 0 0
22 1986 1–1 50.0% #245 1,463 0 0
23 1987 1–2 33.3% #293 1,462 0 0
24 1988 1–3 25.0% #247 1,447 0 0
25 1989 2–2 50.0% #313 1,478 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nick Fulwood Huub Van Boeckel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 0 4 4 0.0%
22 1986 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 0 1 1 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 11 15 26.7% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nick Fulwood Huub Van Boeckel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1488 93.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.08
20 1984 1473 96.8 25.0% -2.50 1–0 +0.25
21 1985 1441 98.2 +9 18.2% -2.09 0–2 2–0 -0.16
22 1986 1464 100.0 42.9% -0.71 2–1 (67%) +0.13
23 1987 1462 102.5 +1 45.5% -0.55 0–1 +0.28 1983 1451 104.0 25.0% -0.83 0–2 0–2 +0.02
24 1988 1448 95.3 -3 27.3% -1.82 1–0 +0.16 1984 1500 103.5 +60 52.2% +0.09 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +1.47
25 1989 1479 102.9 +31 57.1% +0.36 0–1 3–2 (60%) +0.67 1985 1526 112.3 +11 -23 +26 37.3% -0.94 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 101.0 +1.79
27 1987 1513 101.1 +40 28.6% -1.79 1–0 1–1 +0.54
28 1988 1432 91.8 14.3% -2.36 0–2 1–1 +0.67
Career 1507 98.6 +9 37.9% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 8–3 (73%) 102.4 +7.39 1582 105.5 +19 -23 +44 34.8% -1.05 9–10 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 98.2 +8.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.