H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nick Kyrgios vs Dustin Brown H2H: 1-0
Nick Kyrgios holds a 1–0 lead over Dustin Brown in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-7(3) 6-1 2-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nick Kyrgios | 6-7(3) 6-1 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Dustin Brown | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nick Kyrgios | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |