H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nick Kyrgios vs John Isner H2H: 2-2
Nick Kyrgios and John Isner are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nick Kyrgios leads 2–1 on hard courts, while John Isner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nick Kyrgios won the 2019 Acapulco semifinal 7-5 5-7 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 41
Right-Handed
208 cm / 6'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2019* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 7-5 5-7 7-6(7) | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2016* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Nick Kyrgios | 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | John Isner | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2015* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | John Isner | 7-5 6-3 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
| May 8, 2015* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | John Isner | 6-3 6-7(7) 6-4 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| John Isner | #660 | #8 | 3,720 | 2,053 | 467 | 293 | 61.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nick Kyrgios | John Isner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #106 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #34 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #18 | 2,021 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,983 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #11 | 2,026 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #19 | 2,019 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #17 | 1,984 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,956 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,921 | 0 | 15 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 15 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #24 | 1,933 | 0 | 16 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #41 | 1,891 | 0 | 16 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #172 | 1,698 | 0 | 16 |