H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nick Kyrgios vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 2-1
Nick Kyrgios holds a 2–1 lead over Kyle Edmund in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nick Kyrgios leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2019 Canada Masters second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 31
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2019* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-4 | Nick Kyrgios | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Nick Kyrgios | 7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-3 | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
| May 28, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nick Kyrgios | (w/o) | Kyle Edmund | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Kyrgios | #670 | #13 | 2,460 | 2,153 | 197 | 115 | 63.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 7 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nick Kyrgios | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #13 | 2,058 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,986 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #35 | 1,965 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,935 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #45 | 1,951 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,878 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2022 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #22 | 2,096 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #671 | 1,969 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #670 | 1,896 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |