H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Nick Saviano vs Anand Amritraj H2H: 0-1

Anand Amritraj holds a 1–0 lead over Nick Saviano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anand Amritraj leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anand Amritraj won the 1978 Miami Open round of 16 6-4 7-6.

USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
IND Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anand Amritraj 6-4 7-6 Nick Saviano #54 Match data Mar 3, 1978* R16 Miami Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nick Saviano #736 #48 0 1,791 158 199 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anand Amritraj 1,640 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nick Saviano Anand Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,491 0 0
18 1974 1–3 25.0% #220 1,481 0 0
19 1975 2–6 25.0% #179 1,473 0 0
20 1976 7–12 36.8% #115 1,501 0 0
21 1977 13–18 41.9% #60 1,646 0 0
22 1978 32–32 50.0% #72 1,689 0 0
23 1979 24–26 48.0% #72 1,780 0 0
24 1980 19–24 44.2% #93 1,751 0 0
25 1981 26–28 48.1% #97 1,694 0 0
26 1982 14–27 34.1% #99 1,645 0 0
27 1983 20–21 48.8% #97 1,624 0 1
28 1984 0–1 0.0% #745 1,609 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nick Saviano Anand Amritraj
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1972 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 13 13 26 50.0% 1974 3 4 7 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 7 7 0.0%
23 1979 13 12 25 52.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1975 3 9 12 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1980 10 13 23 43.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 1976 3 6 9 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1981 17 15 32 53.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1982 6 12 18 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 1978 3 6 9 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1983 15 12 27 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 70 80 150 46.7% 25 39 64 39.1% 28 30 58 48.3% 35 50 85 41.2% 22 46 68 32.4% 23 50 73 31.5% 18 21 39 46.2% 10 34 44 22.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nick Saviano Anand Amritraj
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1973 1492 100.3 0.0% -4.00 -0.17
18 1974 1481 104.4 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 +0.06 1970 1493 104.0 0.0% -2.00 -0.05
19 1975 1473 104.9 +18 +79 36.4% -0.82 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.2 +0.67 1971 1468 94.4 12.5% -2.63 0–1 -0.08
20 1976 1501 114.5 +3 +4 39.1% -0.30 3–6 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.7 +1.40 1972 1483 109.9 +13 +77 +34 51.2% -0.12 0–4 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 95.8 +1.58
21 1977 1646 132.7 +3 -152 -115 44.9% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +0.43 1973 1515 120.7 +21 -8 +12 37.5% -0.87 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.16
22 1978 1689 139.8 -94 -21 -17 51.0% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–10 (50%) 101.1 +2.15 1974 1601 128.4 -131 -49 -4 38.5% -0.76 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 97.5 -0.34
23 1979 1780 139.0 -23 -129 -114 47.5% -0.25 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) 106.4 -2.47 1975 1537 120.8 -40 -6 34.6% -1.12 5–7 (42%) 4–6 (40%) 101.1 +1.58
24 1980 1751 138.2 -71 -102 +48 45.6% -0.13 7–7 (50%) 5–11 (31%) 97.9 -1.67 1976 1460 124.2 +12 -9 23.0% -1.77 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 +0.72
25 1981 1694 136.6 +35 -25 +4 47.3% -0.38 10–8 (56%) 11–8 (58%) 103.7 -0.21 1977 1534 119.4 -11 -101 +83 42.9% -0.37 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.17
26 1982 1646 141.7 +41 -13 +48 38.5% -0.97 5–8 (38%) 11–3 (79%) 105.0 -3.56 1978 1556 117.8 -30 -65 45.1% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +2.57
27 1983 1624 119.1 +43 -50 +58 46.5% -0.25 9–4 (69%) 8–5 (62%) 105.9 +2.00 1979 1526 124.8 -7 -46 31.0% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 98.7 +0.40
28 1984 1610 99.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.06 1980 1562 126.8 -41 -54 41.4% -0.04 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.1 -0.17
29 1981 1572 124.5 -28 +56 44.4% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 0–2 +0.35
30 1982 1558 101.6 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 +0.34
Career 1791 138.8 -9 -37 -17 45.3% -0.35 57–64 (47%) 63–60 (51%) 103.8 -0.40 1641 128.3 -31 -29 +33 37.4% -0.80 20–43 (32%) 25–40 (38%) 90.6 +3.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.