H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nick Saviano vs Buster C Mottram H2H: 1-1
Nick Saviano and Buster C Mottram are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Buster C Mottram leads 1–0 on clay, while Nick Saviano leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nick Saviano won the 1980 Wimbledon second round 6-7 7-6 6-3 4-6 13-11.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Nick Saviano | 6-7 7-6 6-3 4-6 13-11 | Buster C Mottram | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1978* | Osaka | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Buster C Mottram | 6-1 6-2 | Nick Saviano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick Saviano | #736 | #48 | 0 | 1,789 | 158 | 199 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Buster C Mottram | #735 | #15 | 0 | 1,952 | 270 | 177 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nick Saviano | Buster C Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #33 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #62 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #55 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 32–32 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #34 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #72 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #41 | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #93 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 1981 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #97 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 |
| 1982 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #99 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #32 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |