H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nicklas Kulti vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 0-1

Andrei Olhovskiy holds a 1–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrei Olhovskiy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrei Olhovskiy won the 1993 Copenhagen final 7-5 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicklas Kulti
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Andrei Olhovskiy
RUS Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrei Olhovskiy #87 7-5 3-6 6-2 Nicklas Kulti #45 Match data Mar 7, 1993* F Copenhagen ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,821 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Andrei Olhovskiy #1,310 #49 690 1,731 116 163 41.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicklas Kulti Andrei Olhovskiy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,584 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,747 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1 1987 0–2 0.0% #232 1,470 0 0
22 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,683 0 2 1988 6–8 42.9% #86 1,519 0 0
23 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,676 0 2 1989 4–10 28.6% #302 1,509 0 0
24 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,639 0 2 1990 4–4 50.0% #148 1,567 0 0
25 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,634 0 3 1991 4–10 28.6% #136 1,513 0 0
26 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,579 0 3 1992 16–18 47.1% #80 1,639 0 0
27 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,603 0 3 1993 26–29 47.3% #65 1,662 0 1
28 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,633 0 3 1994 23–27 46.0% #97 1,671 0 1
29 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,559 0 3 1995 12–21 36.4% #118 1,586 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 21–19 52.5% #90 1,695 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–14 0.0% #442 1,492 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,481 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicklas Kulti Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 7 6 13 53.8% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 4 9 13 30.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1993 12 8 20 60.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 12 13 25 48.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
25 1996 5 10 15 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 1 6 83.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 5 7 12 41.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 5 12 17 29.4% 4 9 13 30.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 5 18 72.2%
28 1999 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
29 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 54 73 127 42.5% 53 59 112 47.3% 14 13 27 51.9% 29 34 63 46.0% — 30 61 91 33.0% 16 36 52 30.8% 23 23 46 50.0% 47 43 90 52.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/280 of Nicklas Kulti's and 209/241 of Andrei Olhovskiy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicklas Kulti Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 39/42 2.9 2.5 56.0% 68.8% 50.5% 55.6% 43.7% 60.6% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 40/41 3.8 2.6 59.5% 70.2% 49.0% 50.1% 37.9% 61.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 46/51 4.9 3.1 56.1% 72.0% 49.9% 58.2% 39.3% 62.4% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 39/46 5.1 2.4 57.2% 72.3% 49.6% 59.3% 40.3% 62.4% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 13/14 6.8 2.8 52.0% 76.3% 53.0% 64.6% 44.4% 65.0% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 27/30 7.2 3.8 58.6% 74.3% 49.9% 63.4% 39.5% 64.5% 36.8% 1991 11/14 4.6 4.6 54.5% 68.7% 43.3% 45.8% 38.1% 57.2% 34.9%
26 1997 24/26 7.1 4.7 53.7% 75.0% 46.7% 63.0% 32.6% 62.1% 34.5% 1992 34/34 5.6 4.1 54.4% 74.1% 50.1% 54.5% 38.5% 63.1% 37.8%
27 1998 5/6 7.8 3.8 47.9% 84.3% 53.6% 76.4% 25.0% 68.5% 32.6% 1993 45/55 6.8 3.3 57.9% 74.4% 48.4% 56.1% 34.0% 63.4% 37.0%
28 1999 15/19 7.0 4.7 54.7% 73.8% 46.1% 57.2% 37.8% 61.1% 35.7% 1994 46/50 9.6 5.1 55.7% 75.3% 48.5% 53.6% 44.2% 63.5% 35.8%
29 2000 4/5 8.0 6.0 52.6% 70.6% 37.1% 61.1% 19.8% 54.8% 32.6% 1995 30/33 8.2 3.7 56.8% 73.7% 48.4% 57.7% 29.0% 62.8% 35.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 30/40 8.3 4.8 56.3% 75.4% 47.6% 63.7% 38.3% 63.3% 34.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 12/14 10.7 5.5 52.7% 70.8% 45.8% 60.2% 31.0% 59.0% 32.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 1/1 3.0 1.0 67.8% 62.5% 57.9% 0.0% 100.0% 61.0% 34.2%
Career — 252/329 5.2 3.2 56.3% 72.4% 49.3% 58.4% 38.9% 62.3% 37.0% — 209/279 7.7 4.3 56.0% 74.0% 48.2% 56.0% 37.2% 62.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicklas Kulti Andrei Olhovskiy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1544 129.5 — — — — -4 +26 — 47.1% -0.12 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1584 125.7 — — — — -17 +11 — 42.9% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 96.2 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1747 143.3 — — — — -93 -13 — 53.7% +0.33 3–1 (75%) 2–5 (29%) 102.3 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1657 134.7 -0.06 +0.03 0.980 49.6% +1 +1 — 44.8% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 5–10 (33%) 92.6 -1.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 1612 138.5 +0.13 +0.37 1.025 50.2% -4 +108 — 47.9% -0.10 6–11 (35%) 7–10 (41%) 93.6 -0.36 1987 1471 102.0 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.07
22 1993 1684 141.0 +1.24 -0.26 0.979 49.6% +21 -5 — 52.0% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 9–9 (50%) 101.1 -1.65 1988 1519 108.6 — — — — -34 — +107 45.7% -0.66 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +1.54
23 1994 1677 146.6 +1.15 -1.53 0.958 49.3% +55 -21 — 48.0% -0.24 7–14 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 -2.66 1989 1509 111.6 — — — — -2 -18 — 33.3% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.3 +0.23
24 1995 1640 120.1 +1.85 -0.53 1.112 51.8% +24 +47 — 46.9% +0.09 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.38 1990 1568 127.2 — — — — +6 — — 55.0% +0.45 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.41
25 1996 1635 123.0 +2.52 -1.04 1.037 50.5% -63 +19 -11 48.8% +0.01 4–6 (40%) 12–7 (63%) 100.7 -0.43 1991 1513 111.9 -2.55 -1.87 0.815 46.2% -30 — +200 32.5% -0.95 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.9 +0.66
26 1997 1580 122.1 +0.06 -1.60 0.910 48.5% +24 +9 +52 41.8% -0.81 2–6 (25%) 6–2 (75%) 98.2 -0.05 1992 1639 134.2 +1.24 +0.43 1.025 50.2% -51 -113 +131 49.4% -0.09 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) 104.4 -0.10
27 1998 1603 115.4 +2.10 -1.26 1.036 50.2% +20 — — 46.2% -0.15 1–0 2–0 — +0.15 1993 1662 134.3 +1.97 -1.09 1.010 49.5% +17 -124 +94 48.1% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 12–11 (52%) 103.3 -0.58
28 1999 1633 114.5 +0.18 -1.35 0.918 48.5% -58 -39 +43 51.1% -0.21 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.0 +0.03 1994 1672 128.7 +1.65 -1.73 0.981 49.6% +4 -106 +40 47.0% -0.23 11–12 (48%) 7–16 (30%) 96.1 +1.82
29 2000 1560 104.0 -2.23 -1.39 0.720 44.3% — — — 15.4% -2.39 0–2 1–1 — -0.21 1995 1587 124.1 +0.08 -2.77 0.951 49.1% +39 -62 +77 41.3% -0.43 2–3 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 95.2 +0.70
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1696 125.1 +0.74 -2.13 0.940 49.1% -13 -175 -15 50.5% +0.12 10–8 (56%) 11–14 (44%) 100.4 +1.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1493 110.3 -2.20 -3.61 0.788 45.9% +37 — — 19.4% -1.58 0–7 (0%) 3–6 (33%) 90.9 +0.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1482 100.8 -0.17 -0.96 0.878 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.07
Career — 1821 141.1 +0.80 -0.64 0.981 49.6% +4 +16 +28 47.4% -0.18 41–68 (38%) 57–63 (48%) 93.7 -2.41 — 1732 130.9 +0.85 -1.56 0.961 49.1% +1 -104 +85 44.1% -0.36 44–57 (44%) 57–74 (44%) 98.2 +2.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.