H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs Cristiano Caratti H2H: 1-2
Cristiano Caratti holds a 2–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Cristiano Caratti leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cristiano Caratti won the 1996 New Delhi fourth round 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 1996* | New Delhi | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cristiano Caratti | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1991* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicklas Kulti | 6-1 6-4 | Cristiano Caratti | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1991* | Milan | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Cristiano Caratti | 6-3 6-1 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cristiano Caratti | #836 | #26 | 932 | 1,806 | 71 | 115 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | Cristiano Caratti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #160 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #129 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #82 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #140 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #156 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #138 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #213 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #135 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |