H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs Diego Perez H2H: 1-0
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Perez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1992 Roland Garros fourth round 6-0 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 64
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 6-0 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Diego Perez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Diego Perez | #1,373 | #27 | 389 | 1,830 | 195 | 213 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | Diego Perez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #52 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #61 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #116 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #142 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #128 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #253 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #661 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 |