H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs E. Winogradsky H2H: 1-0
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over E. Winogradsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1989 Australian Open second round 6-2 7-6 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nicklas Kulti | 6-2 7-6 5-7 6-2 | E. Winogradsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| E. Winogradsky | #473 | #89 | 169 | 1,571 | 22 | 41 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | E. Winogradsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #139 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #224 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |