H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC

Nicklas Kulti vs J. Connors H2H: 0-2

J. Connors holds a 2–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, J. Connors leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, J. Connors won the 1992 Long Island third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicklas Kulti
SWE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
J. Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 27, 1992* Long Island ATP 250 R32 Hard J. Connors #33 6-3 6-4 Nicklas Kulti #70 Match data
Aug 23, 1991* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard J. Connors #195 1-6 6-4 6-0 Nicklas Kulti #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicklas Kulti #977 #32 826 1,819 150 179 45.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3
J. Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicklas Kulti J. Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1988 3–4 42.9% #176 1,543 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1989 7–9 43.8% #118 1,581 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1990 15–11 57.7% #51 1,745 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1991 18–24 42.9% #80 1,656 0 1 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1992 18–23 43.9% #79 1,611 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1993 27–24 52.9% #46 1,690 0 2 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1994 20–26 43.5% #99 1,675 0 2 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1995 6–8 42.9% #165 1,638 0 2 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1996 14–16 46.7% #64 1,636 0 3 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1997 9–17 34.6% #154 1,578 0 3 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1998 3–3 50.0% #290 1,602 0 3 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1999 10–9 52.6% #118 1,632 0 3 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 2000 0–5 0.0% #421 1,558 0 3 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 — — — — — — — 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 — — — — — — — 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109