H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-0
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over Jacco Eltingh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1992 Moscow third round 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1992* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicklas Kulti | 7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-4 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |