H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs M. Cierro H2H: 1-0
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over M. Cierro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1992 San Marino third round 7-5 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1992* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | M. Cierro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| M. Cierro | #1,295 | #113 | 295 | 1,535 | 18 | 45 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | M. Cierro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #202 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #126 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #220 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |