H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-0
Nicklas Kulti holds a 1–0 lead over Paul Annacone in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicklas Kulti won the 1992 Memphis second round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1992* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nicklas Kulti | 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |