H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Nicklas Kulti vs T. Tulasne H2H: 0-1
T. Tulasne holds a 1–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, T. Tulasne leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, T. Tulasne won the 1990 Casablanca third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1990* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | T. Tulasne | 7-5 6-0 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| T. Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicklas Kulti | T. Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |