H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 2-2

Nicolas Almagro and Andreas Seppi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on clay, while Andreas Seppi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2017 Italian Open first round 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #73 7-6(6) 6-3 Andreas Seppi #76 Match data May 16, 2017* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Nicolas Almagro #13 7-6(1) 6-0 6-4 Andreas Seppi #22 Match data Jun 2, 2013* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andreas Seppi #46 6-3 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #11 Match data Nov 10, 2011* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Andreas Seppi #69 7-6(4) 7-6(7) 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data Jun 23, 2010* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Andreas Seppi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Andreas Seppi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3%
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1%
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2%
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9%
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2%
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2%
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Andreas Seppi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.78
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.12
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.63
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.24
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) — -1.47
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) — -2.26
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.33
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.68
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.77
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.56
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.46
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.56
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.18
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.62
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.