H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 6-2

Nicolas Almagro holds a 6–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 4–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2014 Buenos Aires fourth round 1-6 7-5 6-4.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 2014* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #18 1-6 7-5 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #84 Match data
Mar 10, 2013* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #11 7-5 6-1 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #52 Match data
Jan 17, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #11 6-4 6-1 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #71 Match data
Jul 14, 2012* Bastad ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #10 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #106 Match data
Nov 3, 2010* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Daniel Gimeno-Traver #59 6-4 3-6 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #16 Match data
Jul 31, 2010* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #18 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #74 Match data
Feb 18, 2010* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R32 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #80 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #26 Match data
Feb 28, 2009* Acapulco ATP 500 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #21 6-2 7-6(2) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0