H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Denis Istomin H2H: 0-6

Denis Istomin holds a 6–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Denis Istomin leads 3–0 on grass and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Denis Istomin won the 2016 Wimbledon second round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-2.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 6
6 main draw meetings
UZB Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 30, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Denis Istomin #116 6-4 7-6(5) 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #47 Match data
Jul 24, 2015* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Denis Istomin #73 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #138 Match data
Jun 23, 2015* Nottingham ATP 250 R64 Grass Denis Istomin #92 6-1 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #145 Match data
Aug 28, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Denis Istomin #65 6-3 6-1 4-6 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #15 Match data
Jul 22, 2010* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Denis Istomin #59 7-6(5) 7-6(7) Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data
Jun 17, 2010* Eastbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Denis Istomin #74 6-4 1-0 (ret.) Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Denis Istomin #1,509 #33 1,217 1,900 191 245 43.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Denis Istomin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #200 1,474 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2008 2–2 50.0% #105 1,559 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2009 13–17 43.3% #102 1,636 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2010 29–29 50.0% #40 1,767 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2011 10–21 32.3% #73 1,665 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2012 26–29 47.3% #43 1,732 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2013 30–29 50.8% #45 1,808 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2014 24–23 51.1% #49 1,853 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2015 20–23 46.5% #61 1,788 0 1
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2016 6–19 24.0% #121 1,711 0 1
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2017 15–18 45.5% #63 1,724 0 2
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2018 12–18 40.0% #92 1,679 0 2
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2019 3–11 21.4% #177 1,567 0 2
33 2020 0–1 0.0% #184 1,545 0 2
34 2021 0–2 0.0% #254 1,545 0 2
35 2022 1–1 50.0% #467 1,577 0 2