H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 0-3

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dmitry Tursunov leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Dmitry Tursunov #23 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #40 Match data
Nov 2, 2006* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Dmitry Tursunov #22 6-3 5-4 (ret.) Nicolas Almagro #36 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Dmitry Tursunov #152 7-6(2) 7-6(4) 6-1 Nicolas Almagro #77 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,914 223 215 50.9% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,681 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,738 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,785 0 1
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2008 35–21 62.5% #22 1,861 0 5
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,705 0 6
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,767 0 7
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2012 3–9 25.0% #122 1,698 0 7
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,746 0 7
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,676 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,622 0 7