H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Dmitry Tursunov H2H: 0-3

Dmitry Tursunov holds a 3–0 lead over Nicolas Almagro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dmitry Tursunov leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Dmitry Tursunov won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Dmitry Tursunov
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dmitry Tursunov #23 7-6(2) 6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 Nicolas Almagro #40 Match data Jun 27, 2007* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Dmitry Tursunov #22 6-3 5-4 (ret.) Nicolas Almagro #36 Match data Nov 2, 2006* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Dmitry Tursunov #152 7-6(2) 7-6(4) 6-1 Nicolas Almagro #77 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Dmitry Tursunov #815 #20 2,290 1,912 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Dmitry Tursunov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2001 3–1 75.0% #174 1,542 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #98 1,610 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2004 12–17 41.4% #80 1,679 0 0
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 2005 16–16 50.0% #60 1,741 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 2006 42–31 57.5% #22 1,778 0 1
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2007 28–21 57.1% #34 1,767 0 3
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2008 35–22 61.4% #22 1,859 0 5
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2009 13–17 43.3% #89 1,701 0 6
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2010 6–9 40.0% #197 1,715 0 6
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2011 18–18 50.0% #40 1,770 0 7
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2012 3–10 23.1% #122 1,693 0 7
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2013 30–21 58.8% #29 1,868 0 7
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 2014 13–19 40.6% #110 1,766 0 7
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2016 1–7 12.5% #411 1,689 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–5 16.7% #487 1,632 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Dmitry Tursunov
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — 2001 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 31 16 47 66.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 15 11 26 57.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 28 14 42 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 7 14 21 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2011 12 15 27 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 151 135 286 52.8% 27 44 71 38.0% 37 30 67 55.2% 8 8 16 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 429/440 of Dmitry Tursunov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% 2001 3/4 6.7 4.0 57.0% 76.5% 45.5% 45.6% 18.6% 63.4% 33.6%
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% 2003 5/5 12.2 5.8 52.6% 70.3% 45.4% 47.1% 44.7% 58.6% 36.1%
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% 2004 29/29 6.9 5.0 53.5% 68.2% 50.3% 62.3% 34.5% 59.9% 34.8%
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% 2005 31/32 9.0 5.7 55.2% 77.7% 46.4% 65.7% 48.7% 63.8% 39.2%
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% 2006 72/73 8.7 3.8 54.8% 74.5% 50.9% 58.9% 41.5% 63.6% 38.0%
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2007 49/49 8.2 4.0 56.0% 74.9% 54.1% 49.4% 44.9% 65.7% 35.8%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2008 53/57 8.0 3.2 58.4% 75.1% 51.7% 65.9% 40.8% 65.1% 36.0%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2009 30/30 6.4 3.3 57.2% 73.8% 51.1% 64.0% 45.2% 64.0% 35.6%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2010 15/15 5.7 2.4 62.2% 69.5% 55.4% 58.5% 47.7% 64.2% 33.6%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2011 35/36 6.6 4.1 60.6% 70.5% 49.8% 60.7% 42.6% 62.1% 34.0%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2012 12/13 6.2 2.7 58.5% 73.9% 46.6% 59.3% 22.0% 62.1% 32.5%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2013 50/51 7.4 4.6 57.8% 74.3% 50.0% 59.7% 44.2% 63.7% 36.5%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% 2014 31/32 5.6 3.1 61.3% 68.8% 50.5% 64.7% 46.4% 61.9% 35.0%
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 8/8 4.8 3.1 60.7% 66.9% 48.4% 60.5% 43.2% 59.5% 31.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 65.3% 62.5% 40.5% 54.0% 35.1% 54.9% 30.2%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 429/440 7.4 3.9 57.4% 73.1% 50.5% 60.1% 42.4% 63.3% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Dmitry Tursunov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 -0.67 2001 1543 113.3 -0.56 +1.80 0.919 47.8% +43 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 2–0 — +0.16
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) 90.7 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 99.5 -2.25 2003 1611 120.7 -1.94 +0.40 0.873 47.6% +63 — — 38.9% -0.28 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.16
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) 97.9 +1.58 2004 1679 122.1 -2.57 -0.92 0.868 47.7% -8 -166 -127 41.8% -0.52 7–5 (58%) 7–7 (50%) 102.4 -1.08
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) 96.6 +1.82 2005 1742 140.2 +0.93 +1.97 1.082 51.8% -49 — -30 52.9% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -1.22
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) 98.1 +0.28 2006 1778 142.8 +1.19 +1.27 1.045 50.9% -3 -200 -16 55.3% +0.27 16–17 (48%) 19–13 (59%) 102.4 +1.38
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) 105.3 +0.21 2007 1767 135.6 +1.31 -0.47 1.044 50.8% +2 -220 +74 54.5% +0.32 12–9 (57%) 12–7 (63%) 104.7 +2.65
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) 100.1 +2.38 2008 1860 147.7 +1.87 +0.11 1.032 50.6% +36 -281 +4 57.0% +0.36 10–3 (77%) 14–11 (56%) 107.5 -0.15
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) 102.7 +1.39 2009 1702 134.8 +0.01 -1.06 0.988 50.2% +12 — +189 47.9% +0.10 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) 93.7 +1.41
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) 97.7 +3.89 2010 1715 128.5 +1.03 -0.62 0.937 49.0% +10 — — 43.6% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.47
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.08 2011 1770 139.9 -0.29 -2.16 0.896 48.5% -29 — +155 50.0% -0.27 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 105.2 -0.69
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.2 -3.74 2012 1693 121.2 -0.78 -2.26 0.857 47.3% +20 — +108 28.1% -1.16 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.15
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 95.5 +0.05 2013 1869 152.8 +0.49 -0.37 1.006 50.7% +24 -219 — 58.8% +0.44 9–7 (56%) 15–5 (75%) 112.1 +0.52
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 100.9 -1.98 2014 1766 144.7 -1.43 -0.21 0.917 49.1% +26 -36 -10 46.2% -0.08 2–4 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 98.4 +0.04
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2015 1753 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1690 111.7 -2.62 -1.37 0.772 46.5% +48 — — 25.0% -1.55 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 -0.60
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1633 107.5 -2.99 -2.95 0.668 42.8% +52 — — 15.4% -2.46 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1912 145.7 +0.30 -0.19 0.978 49.9% +7 -180 +50 50.7% +0.03 82–72 (53%) 104–89 (54%) 106.7 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.