H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Almagro and Ernests Gulbis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 6-3 6-2 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2009* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ernests Gulbis | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Almagro | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |