H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Almagro vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 3-1
Nicolas Almagro holds a 3–1 lead over Federico Delbonis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Nicolas Almagro | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2013* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-1 7-6(3) | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2012* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicolas Almagro | 6-3 6-2 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Almagro | #846 | #9 | 2,735 | 2,076 | 385 | 272 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 13 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Almagro | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #103 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2005 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #32 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 34–16 | 68.0% | #18 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #26 | 1,831 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #10 | 1,874 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2012 | 51–21 | 70.8% | #11 | 2,010 | 0 | 12 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #13 | 1,961 | 0 | 12 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #71 | 1,928 | 0 | 12 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #73 | 1,795 | 0 | 12 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,790 | 0 | 13 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #151 | 1,833 | 0 | 13 | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #846 | 1,777 | 0 | 13 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |