H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Frantisek Cermak H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Frantisek Cermak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2006 Palermo round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Frantisek Cermak
CZE Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #47 6-1 6-2 Frantisek Cermak #1554 Match data Sep 29, 2006* R16 Palermo ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Frantisek Cermak #1,131 #201 180 1,567 9 15 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Frantisek Cermak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2001 0–1 0.0% #367 1,458 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 — — — — — — —
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2003 5–7 41.7% #215 1,499 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2004 1–2 33.3% #367 1,480 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2005 2–2 50.0% #461 1,497 0 0
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2006 1–1 50.0% #694 1,510 0 0
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 — — — — — — —
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #684 1,551 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Frantisek Cermak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 24/24 of Frantisek Cermak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Frantisek Cermak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2001 1/1 2.0 3.0 68.6% 58.3% 36.4% 50.0% 100.0% 51.4% 40.0%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2003 12/12 3.1 2.0 58.5% 66.4% 49.1% 49.6% 52.1% 58.6% 40.2%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2004 3/3 5.0 3.3 63.0% 72.7% 47.1% 40.8% 28.2% 63.2% 35.3%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2005 4/4 4.3 5.0 60.8% 70.6% 46.9% 74.6% 41.6% 61.2% 39.6%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2006 2/2 3.5 5.0 52.8% 58.2% 44.1% 27.8% 25.0% 51.5% 35.7%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 1.5 6.0 50.0% 63.1% 37.5% 52.1% 50.0% 48.1% 27.3%
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 24/24 3.4 3.3 58.7% 66.6% 46.5% 51.1% 46.9% 57.8% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Frantisek Cermak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) — -2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) — +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) — +0.28 2000 1491 95.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) — +0.21 2001 1459 97.6 +0.67 -0.76 0.824 47.3% — — — — — — — — -0.06
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) — +2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) — +1.39 2003 1500 112.1 -1.87 +0.62 0.970 49.6% — +57 — 40.0% -0.20 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) — +3.89 2004 1480 100.0 -1.01 -3.47 0.958 49.0% — +70 — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–0 — +0.19
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.08 2005 1498 107.4 +0.14 +1.24 1.022 50.6% — +70 — 50.0% +0.30 1–1 0–2 — -0.16
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) — -3.74 2006 1511 104.1 -1.92 -0.20 0.737 43.4% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — -0.08
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.05 2007 1497 113.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.98 2008 1469 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 2009 1508 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1552 98.3 -2.77 -2.45 0.526 38.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.26
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1481 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1489 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1454 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1428 91.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1406 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1567 103.4 -1.40 -0.17 0.902 48.1% — +63 — 39.2% -0.59 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.8 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.