H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 4-3

Nicolas Almagro holds a 4–3 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Nicolas Almagro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2016 Los Cabos fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 2016* Los Cabos ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Almagro #48 7-6(4) 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #52 Match data
Apr 8, 2016* Marrakech ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 1-6 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #62 Match data
Jul 19, 2013* Hamburg ATP 500 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #15 6-2 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #85 Match data
Jul 12, 2013* Bastad ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #16 3-6 6-1 6-1 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #73 Match data
Sep 2, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Almagro #16 6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(4) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #53 Match data
Sep 12, 2008* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 6-4 7-5 Nicolas Almagro #18 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #104 6-3 3-6 5-7 6-1 6-2 Nicolas Almagro #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5