H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 7-2

Nicolas Almagro holds a 7–2 lead over Jose Acasuso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Almagro leads 6–2 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2011 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2011* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Almagro #13 7-5 6-3 Jose Acasuso #256 Match data
Mar 1, 2008* Acapulco ATP 500 SF Clay Nicolas Almagro #28 6-4 3-6 7-5 Jose Acasuso #46 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Nicolas Almagro #29 6-3 6-4 Jose Acasuso #64 Match data
May 18, 2007* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #52 6-2 6-3 Jose Acasuso #32 Match data
May 11, 2006* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #54 6-4 2-6 6-4 Jose Acasuso #34 Match data
Mar 3, 2006* Acapulco ATP 250 R16 Clay Nicolas Almagro #100 6-3 (ret.) Jose Acasuso #35 Match data
Jul 7, 2005* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Nicolas Almagro #88 6-4 6-1 Jose Acasuso #44 Match data
May 20, 2005* St. Poelten ATP 250 R16 Clay Jose Acasuso #69 6-4 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #78 Match data
Feb 12, 2005* Buenos Aires ATP 250 QF Clay Jose Acasuso #57 6-3 6-4 Nicolas Almagro #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,076 385 272 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,537 0 0
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,667 0 1
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,613 0 1
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,678 0 2
22 2008 34–16 68.0% #18 1,794 0 4 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,724 0 2
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,831 0 5 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,709 0 3
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,885 0 7 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,685 0 3
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,874 0 10 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 2012 51–21 70.8% #11 2,010 0 12 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,731 0 3
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,961 0 12 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,666 0 3
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,928 0 12 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,656 0 3
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,790 0 13
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,833 0 13
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,777 0 13