H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Almagro vs Jurgen Zopp H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Almagro holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Zopp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Almagro leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Almagro won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(2) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Almagro
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jurgen Zopp
EST Age 38 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Almagro #16 6-4 7-6(2) 7-5 Jurgen Zopp #183 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Almagro #846 #9 2,735 2,079 388 274 58.6% 0 0 0 2 11 13
Jurgen Zopp #1,406 #71 656 1,715 16 31 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jurgen Zopp
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2003 1–1 50.0% #156 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2004 2–7 22.2% #103 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 13–22 37.1% #114 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2006 27–20 57.4% #32 1,721 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2007 32–27 54.2% #28 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2008 34–17 66.7% #18 1,771 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2009 30–24 55.6% #26 1,829 0 5 2011 0–1 0.0% #146 1,562 0 0
24 2010 41–23 64.1% #15 1,884 0 7 2012 7–11 38.9% #89 1,672 0 0
25 2011 47–23 67.1% #10 1,876 0 10 2013 1–6 14.3% #334 1,610 0 0
26 2012 54–22 71.1% #11 2,013 0 12 2014 1–2 33.3% #189 1,629 0 0
27 2013 42–23 64.6% #13 1,962 0 12 2015 0–2 0.0% #163 1,600 0 0
28 2014 15–10 60.0% #71 1,924 0 12 2016 1–2 33.3% #329 1,597 0 0
29 2015 18–20 47.4% #73 1,795 0 12 2017 1–1 50.0% #163 1,611 0 0
30 2016 22–22 50.0% #44 1,792 0 13 2018 5–6 45.5% #143 1,599 0 0
31 2017 10–12 45.5% #151 1,835 0 13 — — — — — — —
32 2018 0–1 0.0% #846 1,780 0 13 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jurgen Zopp
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 12 17 29 41.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1 6 7 14.3% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 9 12 21 42.9% 23 13 36 63.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 29 8 37 78.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 10 11 21 47.6% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 25 9 34 73.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2011 13 12 25 52.0% 32 9 41 78.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 19 11 30 63.3% 30 9 39 76.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 17 11 28 60.7% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 1 1 2 50.0% 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — — — — — 2016 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 6 8 25.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 3 5 8 37.5% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 102 110 212 48.1% 269 145 414 65.0% 14 16 30 46.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — 6 15 21 28.6% 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 651/662 of Nicolas Almagro's and 47/47 of Jurgen Zopp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jurgen Zopp
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2003 1/2 0.0 0.0 36.4% 100.0% 57.1% — 33.3% 72.7% 56.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 9/9 6.7 4.2 56.5% 69.8% 45.4% 51.5% 37.1% 59.5% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 35/35 6.1 2.9 62.4% 69.2% 50.2% 66.5% 46.5% 62.0% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 47/47 6.7 2.3 60.8% 73.9% 54.5% 68.1% 42.4% 65.8% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 59/59 7.8 2.4 61.1% 74.4% 52.1% 58.9% 43.7% 65.7% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 49/51 9.1 2.4 59.0% 75.4% 55.1% 62.6% 43.0% 67.0% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 53/54 10.4 2.6 59.1% 75.5% 52.2% 55.1% 42.3% 66.0% 36.3% 2011 1/1 6.0 4.0 55.1% 65.3% 57.5% 55.6% 25.0% 61.8% 32.7%
24 2010 64/64 8.2 1.9 59.7% 75.1% 53.6% 55.5% 40.6% 66.4% 37.2% 2012 18/18 4.9 2.5 60.9% 68.5% 49.5% 53.7% 35.4% 60.8% 35.8%
25 2011 70/70 7.8 2.6 55.9% 76.0% 53.9% 57.1% 40.5% 66.0% 37.5% 2013 7/7 3.6 4.4 57.0% 61.1% 39.8% 62.0% 40.7% 53.0% 32.2%
26 2012 71/76 8.7 1.9 56.8% 77.1% 55.4% 60.5% 38.8% 67.8% 37.8% 2014 3/3 3.7 2.7 59.3% 68.0% 50.2% 8.3% 62.5% 60.6% 21.6%
27 2013 65/65 9.6 2.5 57.1% 78.6% 55.4% 58.4% 47.2% 68.7% 39.0% 2015 2/2 3.0 1.5 64.1% 66.3% 50.4% 68.3% 0.0% 60.4% 24.5%
28 2014 23/25 7.0 2.0 55.7% 76.6% 55.0% 58.0% 40.7% 66.8% 37.5% 2016 3/3 5.7 3.3 64.4% 71.1% 51.9% 61.1% 13.3% 64.0% 33.3%
29 2015 38/38 7.6 3.0 56.6% 74.3% 51.8% 56.1% 29.3% 64.7% 35.5% 2017 2/2 7.0 2.5 58.8% 73.1% 44.6% 50.0% 50.0% 61.2% 33.1%
30 2016 44/44 10.0 4.0 54.0% 74.8% 51.9% 53.8% 38.2% 64.3% 36.1% 2018 11/11 5.7 2.3 60.5% 73.3% 49.9% 57.1% 36.3% 64.1% 32.0%
31 2017 22/22 7.0 2.3 55.0% 73.1% 48.6% 42.2% 43.1% 61.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1/1 11.0 2.0 56.8% 85.7% 54.2% 83.3% 0.0% 72.1% 21.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 651/662 8.3 2.5 58.0% 75.3% 53.3% 58.3% 41.2% 66.0% 37.5% — 47/47 4.9 2.8 60.3% 68.7% 48.4% 53.8% 35.6% 60.6% 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Almagro Jurgen Zopp
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2003 1511 102.5 +0.97 -0.39 2.063 63.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2004 1540 123.5 -0.44 -0.86 0.934 48.1% — +48 — 33.3% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1552 131.3 -0.66 -0.28 0.962 49.6% -60 +64 — 42.7% -0.29 3–8 (27%) 5–14 (26%) 90.7 +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1721 147.3 +3.48 +0.92 1.130 52.0% -200 +123 — 56.6% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 9–12 (43%) 99.5 -2.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1724 151.2 +2.51 +0.51 1.100 51.6% -85 +74 — 55.1% +0.46 8–9 (47%) 9–13 (41%) 97.9 +1.58 2009 1497 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1771 147.2 +3.48 +1.81 1.213 53.3% -180 +206 — 66.4% +0.97 6–8 (43%) 10–12 (45%) 96.6 +1.82 2010 1506 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1830 149.5 +2.70 -0.46 1.067 51.0% -100 +75 -243 50.7% +0.31 11–7 (61%) 12–22 (35%) 98.1 +0.28 2011 1562 114.9 -2.32 -0.40 0.855 46.3% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
24 2010 1885 153.6 +2.97 +1.08 1.108 51.5% -104 +208 -336 59.1% +0.57 18–9 (67%) 19–15 (56%) 105.3 +0.21 2012 1673 129.4 -1.18 -1.00 0.914 47.9% -32 -11 — 39.5% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +1.46
25 2011 1877 158.8 +3.24 +0.58 1.103 51.5% -72 +241 -277 63.1% +0.58 11–10 (52%) 26–14 (65%) 100.1 +2.38 2013 1611 113.7 -2.66 -1.98 0.685 44.0% +2 — — 26.3% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.39
26 2012 2013 163.5 +4.96 +1.63 1.175 52.2% -64 +142 -248 62.9% +0.81 18–5 (78%) 18–23 (44%) 102.7 +1.39 2014 1630 104.2 -0.71 -2.27 0.548 42.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.15
27 2013 1963 162.6 +5.10 +1.96 1.247 53.4% +6 +111 -176 61.9% +0.92 8–8 (50%) 17–17 (50%) 97.7 +3.89 2015 1601 110.9 -0.02 -3.75 0.619 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.03
28 2014 1924 150.9 +2.23 +1.75 1.132 51.4% — +77 — 61.5% +0.54 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.08 2016 1597 114.6 -0.16 -2.06 0.925 47.6% — — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
29 2015 1796 152.1 +1.64 -0.54 1.007 50.2% +54 +182 — 45.6% -0.48 5–6 (45%) 10–9 (53%) 98.2 -3.74 2017 1611 112.7 +0.06 +0.46 0.854 47.8% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
30 2016 1793 148.9 +0.66 -0.29 1.010 49.9% -21 +144 — 50.4% +0.07 9–10 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 95.5 +0.05 2018 1599 112.1 -0.70 -2.21 0.893 48.3% — +106 — 41.2% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 104.4 +0.93
31 2017 1835 150.4 -0.33 -0.08 0.929 49.1% -81 +97 — 51.1% +0.19 3–3 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 100.9 -1.98 2019 1548 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1780 96.9 -0.24 -0.55 0.765 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2079 159.4 +2.82 +0.73 1.102 51.5% -73 +138 -255 56.7% +0.45 111–100 (53%) 158–175 (47%) 96.3 +0.54 — 1716 120.9 -1.12 -1.62 0.830 46.8% -22 +51 — 34.7% -0.83 8–9 (47%) 3–9 (25%) 95.8 +3.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.